Founder MindsetProven Pattern

Concentrate resources on 3-5 key bets rather than spreading thin across many initiatives

Bold ideas need bold resourcing. When resources are spread like peanut butter across many initiatives, impactful ideas don't receive what they need to thrive. Cutting even good ideas that aren't perishable, strategic, or differentiating allows you to go all-in on what matters most.

When to use

During planning cycles when deciding what to prioritize; when feeling pressure to pursue many opportunities simultaneously; when good ideas are competing for limited resources

Don't do this

Hedging by spreading resources across many bets to reduce risk—this often ensures that no single initiative gets enough resources to succeed

7 Founders Who Did This

1
Facebook Liveby Fidji Simo

Shifted from 10 to 100+ engineers on Facebook Live in one week by pausing all other projects, gathering the team to explain the data and opportunity

Result:Aligned staffing with stated priorities, enabling Facebook Live to become a transformative product for creators
Read full story →
2
Slackby Noah Desai Weiss

Slack's product team reviews roadmaps through a 70:20:10 lens to ensure diversified risk allocation across core optimization (70%), adjacent opportunities (20%), and moonshot bets (10%)

Result:Prevents teams from only doing incremental improvements and ensures bold bets receive appropriate resource allocation
Read full story →
3
Ownby Sam Gutmann

Killed all products except Salesforce backup despite having ServiceNow and other platforms ready. Said no to new ecosystem ideas constantly until crossing $100M ARR. When growing 100%+ annually in a single-digit penetrated market, extreme focus prevented dilution.

Result:Achieved 100%+ annual growth rates by concentrating resources on one platform until $100M ARR
Read full story →
4
Starter Storyby Pat Walls

Drove 3,029 miles on a Think Week road trip in May 2020. Was running 2 businesses plus multiple side projects and earning under $10K/month. Realized spreading focus across many projects was the root cause of stagnation

Result:Doubled revenue within 30 days of focusing, tripled within 2 months, achieved 60x revenue increase compared to pre-Think Week levels
Read full story →
5
Vercelby Guillermo Rauch

Practices extreme selectivity - 'say nine no's for every yes' on feature development. Said no to expanding beyond frontend even when financially tempting to maintain focus

Result:Focus on frontend cloud rather than general deployment enabled Vercel to dominate a specific category and grow to $9.3B valuation
Read full story →
6
Quirkyby Ben Kaufman

Spread resources across 400+ products and 50+ launches per year instead of concentrating on making a few products truly valuable

Result:No individual product achieved product-market fit, negative margins across the board, $185M burned in 6 years
Read full story →
7
Katerraby Michael Marks

With $2B in funding, spread resources across 20+ acquisitions and full vertical integration instead of focusing on key opportunities

Result:Bankruptcy in 2021 despite being the most-funded private construction company
Read full story →